You are here: Home > News > Pamberi Trust > HIV & Aids: The role of religion in addressing gender dynamics.
HIV & Aids: The role of religion in addressing gender dynamics. Print E-mail
News - Pamberi Trust
Tuesday, 07 September 2010 12:35
Gender Forum Discussion:

The Book Café, Fife Ave Mall (upstairs)

Thursday 16 Sept, 2010 – 5.30-7pm

 

HIV & Aids: The role of religion in addressing gender dynamics.
 

There is now evidence that in Africa more females are affected and infected by HIV/AIDS. However, most interventions have not addressed critical gender issues, for example, gendered and unfair division of labour, unequal access to resources including health care and services, women’s powerlessness, low social worth and inability to make decisions even about their bodies. The HIV/AIDS has added burdens to an already over-burdened, powerless, victimised, oppressed and under-valued group. African villages are now overflowing with women victims of HIV/AIDS who contracted the virus in their bedrooms or because they were victims of rape, marital rape, polygamous relationships, incest, economic hardship and despair that drove them to commercial sex work, exploitation by relatives and a myriad of other factors whose root cause is gender inequality.

 
Women can and are already doing a lot to cope with the pandemic, but Gender roles, or societal expectations regarding how men and women behave and function, may play a role in HIV risk dynamics.  For example, in some societies men are assumed to have the right to decide whether and when to have sex, regardless of the woman’s wishes. 
 
Expectations of sexual fidelity often differ by sex, putting one or the other partner at greater risk of infection.  Personal gender ideologies may influence sexual behavior as individuals seek to act in ways that are consistent with their concepts of masculinity or femininity (also referred to as gender display).  For example, condom use may be promoted by ideas of masculinity that include the importance of protecting one’s partner. 
 
Gender-based power differentials can influence the risk of unprotected intercourse.  Some examples may be found in coercive sex, a woman’s unwillingness to demand condom use, or a wife’s inability to refuse sex with an infected partner.  Other sources of power differentials include age differences and cultural norms that assign members of one sex a subservient position.
 
The contexts in which condoms are used, how do gender norms affect the ease of condom use in different types of relationships (e.g., temporary versus committed)?  How does correct and consistent condom use in the context of an ongoing relationship vary in relation to which partner introduces it and when?
 
How can religious leaders play their part in their spheres of influence to disseminate balanced information that can effect behaviour change in the communities they serve?  Are there religious practices that are discriminatory and detrimental to the fight against HIV & AIDS? 

 

This month, The Book Cafe Gender Forum, wishes to engage you in yet another pertinent issue that is haunting nations around the world.

 

The discussion is free and all are welcome.

 

 


Compiled by Batsirai E Chigama

For Pamberi Trust

Tel: 0915179168